Looks like the market for stretch-mark-fetish pornography is bigger than I predicted.
Vivid Entertainment recently offered infamous octuplet-mom Nadya Suleman $1 million to appear in one of their videos.
Yuck.
Who wants to see that woman in a porno? Aren't pornos supposed to be pleasurable? Or is there some sick sort of 'hate-your-cock' fetish section I luckily am not aware of (til now)?
I mean, first of all, she's not an actress, and that shit's important.
Secondly, she is not attractive in the slightest--a man's penis might actually invert if its owner saw this woman naked (think of the lawsuits!).
Thirdly, there is not a cock in the land that wouldn't simply get lost inside that black hole between her legs.
How could Vivid possibly make a profit off this? I mean, $1 million to Octomom, $15 to the homeless guy they pay to fuck her (plus $5 for his pre-bang Viagra/Schnapps pick-me-up), $10 for a Betamax cassette, $9 for Mac and cheese for the whole crew of slave laborers...there's no way they'll make that money back!
Or will they?
I guess we'll just have to wait and see. Perhaps Vivid knows the appetites of men better than this sailor...
_
No comments:
Post a Comment