So, you haven't tried ecstasy yet.
Well, it's probably for the best, since you will most likely want to do it again, and again, and that isn't very good for your brain.
If you'd like to simulate the experience, the only thing I can think of that comes close is riding a horse. But, wait--no! Don't do it! It's too dangerous!
How somebody named Professor Nutt, who has such 'interesting' theories, rose to a position of power and influence within the British medical community is beyond me.
Did he pass out free smiley-face pot cookies at the meeting where they voted, and everybody got so confused they voted for the funniest name?
Probably--Brits never say no to sweets.
_
2 comments:
3 times as many people die from dealing with horses than from taking ecstasy. And when you consider that far more people are taking ecstasy than poncing about on horses. You find that horse riding is 29 times more dangerous and consider that horse riding involves wearing helmets traning from experienced horsey types whereas e use is completely unregulated and unlike Holland it is impossible to get the pills checked for any "fillers". If the government could just grow up and look at this rationally I'm sure that Ecstasy use could be even safer than it is now.
Holy shit! Since when does E cost only $3.50 a pop?!
In my day USD$15 was the going rate, and that's when the minimum wage was only $4.75 and we had a white man for President
Post a Comment